How to Run a RIF Adverse Impact Analysis

A reduction in force analysis tests whether the people selected for termination were chosen on merit-related grounds, or whether the selection fell disproportionately on a protected group. It can be run before decisions are final, or afterwards to understand and defend the process that was used.

Running it beforehand is the version that can prevent unintended consequences. Running it afterwards is the version that explains them.

What Employers Need to Know

  • Four statutes shape the analysis: the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act, the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

  • The work should be set up so that it is protected by attorney-client privilege, which means engaging counsel first and having the analysis run at their direction.

  • Comparison groups decide the result. They should be formed from employees who reasonably should have been considered together for termination, such as a job family, function or department.

  • Those decisional units are scrutinized both legally and analytically, so how they were drawn needs to be defensible on its own terms.

  • The analysis looks at the entire decision-making process rather than only the final list, checking whether selections rest on merit-related variables such as seniority or performance.

  • Age is the exposure most often underestimated in a RIF, which is why the ADEA and OWBPA sit at the top of the list rather than the bottom.

Frequently Asked Questions

About the Infographic

DCI's guide on conducting an analysis on reductions in force, either before or after they happen, covers key considerations for employers including: why an analysis should be conducted, the relevant laws that should be considered, and the factors and variables that should be included in a RIF analysis.

Submit the form to download the guide.

Access the Infographic: