State Requirement Tracker for Employers

Employers that operate in more than one state face a patchwork of requirements on AI in employment, pay transparency, pay reporting, and affirmative action, and the rules rarely line up. See which requirements apply today, which have passed but are not yet in effect, and what each one asks of you.

Last updated September 2026

Where things stand

Four compliance areas, one map

Select one of the compliance areas below to see which states have pending and enacted requirements.

Analysis of AI in Employment
AKALARAZCACOFLGAHIIAIDILINKSKYLAMEMIMNMOMSMTNCNDNENHNMNVNYOHOKORPASCSDTNTXUTVAVTWAWIWVWY CT DC DE MA MD NJ RI PR

Smaller Northeastern states, D.C., and Puerto Rico are labeled at right.

  • 5 Law in EffectRequirements bind employers now
  • 1 Law Passed, Not Yet in EffectEnacted, with a future effective date
  • 46 No Applicable LawNothing tracked in this area yet
Select a state on the map to see the requirement, its status, and DCI's summary.

Due to rapid changes in the regulatory environment, we can't guarantee information on this map is up to date. This information is provided for general information purposes only and these materials are not intended to provide legal advice. These copyrighted materials may not be reproduced, copied, or used without prior permission from the authors.

Operate in more than one state?

Select every state where you have employees and get a free compliance assessment of the requirements that apply to you, delivered as a formatted PDF.

Start my compliance assessment

State by state

Regulatory landscape, from A to Z

Pick an area, then search by state or filter by status.

  • Law in Effect

    California

    Amendments to the Fair Employment and Housing Act

    “Automated decision systems” (ADS) added to the Act, which already prohibits employment discrimination in most cases. ADS vendors are also liable for discrimination resulting from the use of the ADS.

    Read DCI's Analysis
  • Passed, Not Yet in Effect

    Colorado

    Senate Bill 26-189

    The bill establishes consumer notice requirements, mandating that deployers provide clear and conspicuous notice to consumers at the point of interaction with a covered ADMT. A deployer is required to provide a consumer with a plain language description of a covered ADMT's role within 30 days after the covered ADMT makes a consequential decision that results in an adverse outcome for the consumer. Goes into effect on January 1, 2027.

    Learn More
  • Law in Effect

    Connecticut

    Connecticut Artificial Intelligence Responsibility and Transparency (CART) Act

    Employers must tell workers and applicants when they are interacting with AEDT and provide written pre-decision notices, with phased compliance deadlines of October 1, 2026 and October 1, 2027.

    Read DCI's Analysis
  • Law in Effect

    Illinois

    Illinois House Bill 3773
    Illinois Artificial Intelligence Video Interview Act

    House Bill 3773 (Effective 01/01/26): Prohibits employment discrimination in hiring, promotion, and other employment-related decisions based on protected classes such as race, gender, or religion by AI-tools. Also requires employers to notify employees and applicants when AI is being used.

    Video Interview Act: Employers must inform applicants that artificial intelligence (AI) may be used to analyze video interviews along with the general characteristics the AI is using to evaluate. Consent must be obtained by interviewees prior to the interview.

    Learn More
  • Law in Effect

    New York

    New York City Local Law 144
    Assembly Bill A3778

    New York City Local Law 144: Employers must provide at least 10 business days’ notice of the use of an automated employment decision tool (AEDT) on the employment section of their website. Employers must conduct a bias audit on AEDTs within one year of use of the tool using an independent third party.

    Assembly Bill A3778: Employers with 100 or more employees must conduct a third party impact assessments on automated employment decision tools.

    Learn More
  • Law in Effect

    Texas

    HB 149

    Employers are prohibited from intentional discrimination based on protected characteristics, including race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, and disability.

    Read DCI's Analysis

Free compliance report

See what requirements apply in the jurisdictions where you operate

Select every state where you have employees. We'll pull each requirement that touches your footprint across all four areas into one summary, then give you a formatted PDF to share with your HR, compensation, and legal teams.

1

Choose your states

0 selected

What we're tracking

Why these four areas matter

As the federal government pulls back enforcement on EEO and anti-discrimination requirements, many states have pushed forward with their own. These laws govern critical employer operations such as hiring and compensation, as well as the use of AI in employment decisions.

Analysis of AI in Employment

There has been a significant increase in the number of proposed regulations surrounding bias audits of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in employment. As these tools become more prevalent in employment processes, concerns about potential biases have emerged. State and local governments are recognizing the need to ensure equal employment opportunities. These laws aim to hold employers accountable for the use of AI tools and often require them to conduct audits to identify any biases that may exist.

AI-based tool review
Pay Transparency

Pay transparency regulations have been on the rise. Individual states have led the charge in a variety of ways, frequently requiring employers to publicly provide information on pay to applicants and employees.

Compensation consulting
Pay Reporting

Multiple states have gone a step further than pay transparency and now require the submission of data on employee compensation to analyze and root out pay disparities.

State pay reporting
Affirmative Action

The large number of affirmative action regulations in various states throughout the United States presents a challenge for employers with operations in multiple locations. Often, the requirements and enforcement of these different regulations are unique and require specialized reporting and implementation that differs from federal regulations.

State affirmative action plans